Among the questions often asked by customers when selecting a counselor or a system for trading CFD? What percentage of the recommendations can? ask to be winners and think you should do every month, year or whatever. These are part of a psychological nature comodit?, But is part of the reason why many people are missing as traders. In any area of speculation, though? Investment's stock market, spreadbetting, forex trade in CFDs or if the background has a small advantage, it? only the first part of potential success. The key to achieving steady returns is a correct method to the ratio of victory / loss and not in anticipation of all the particular level of earnings, which may storch methodology background. The CFD traders have the capacity? to go long and desire to drink? and the online business makes it easy to record any time the arrests and objectives. A good example of victory / loss failsConsider that this example: A CFD trader select a system where there? for an alleged seven-on evidenced every ten businesses that are winners. The idea would be that every business has a return of 3% and where? made the position? closed. If, however, trade shows a loss of 3%, the expectation? which should recover and position? doubled up, hoping for reference to equality? or even manufacturing gain of 6%. Now if the movement of any part of the market were a random sequence, would any difference where an entry or exit. The general would return over time n? an increase n? a loss, but the costs and spread on trade would cause a loss virtual guaranteed in due course (the method the casino?). Have a slight advantage? enoughIf that this system has had an advantage, however, the expectation that could target of 3% possibly would have affected six out of ten times, what? make a virtual method of conquest. But the problem lies in the fact that even if markets and the parties have periods of short duration with action appears to be random, may be selling a range that trend to another? of? of? this time? strong what? known as irregolarit? normal, which might seem a paradox, but it happens constantly in financial markets. The parties often move very quickly in one direction and this trend can? continue for some more? long as foreseen, which creates two problems. First, take a profit of 3% on a trade pu? seem to be very satisfactory, but can? often be seen in retrospect that the profit? was taken too soon, so that despite the achievement of trade in conquest there? an element of regret that pi? not? was taken. Secondly, if the position is showing a loss, then trade in the real world should be considered to be wrong and sealed off. But in using a system like this, doubling up or doing the media's position on the loss, all that is done? an increase in? of that? of? risk the merchant might be lucky in some situations, but one or two trade by the ten pu? cause severe problems. There? also the capital that impressionable? tied up in trade loss. This type of system could produce typically says six winners of 3%, two levels (where a position? Been doubled up and has returned to equality?) And two losers of 10%. Here the total loss was 2%, despite the good relationship victory / loss and this? clearly a dangerous way to play the markets, but many traders work exactly in that sense. The improvement in the first rewardThe / risk? loss of a regular stop on every trade and stick to it. The doubling in just about doubles? of? of? risk? well if there? another signal of the system that reinforces the first trade, but GENERAL? not? the case. The problem that happens then? that if the arrest and the targets are close enough in the percentage call, periods of the average short-casualit? who can? almost be like the euro that disposable, that the costs? a method useless. The key? then to determine the gains? much more of the losses, so that even if one realizes only four wins out of ten, there may be two big winners in l?. If a merchant decides that an average 3% loss? acceptable, and that average earnings should be tried? There? ? demand $ 64 and the key? leaving the operations of the profits pi? possible within a well defined trend. The following rules is part of the methodology used to the blue and want to make the folder short of CFD and long-term results so far have shown most satisfactory. Some simple rules for a constant approach1 of conquest. If businesses trying to reserve the test to choose the high volatilit? or beta? of? of? Party un'pi they? High Probability? to be a trend rather than selling or exhibiting a range action.2 random. The initial goal should always be provided at least twice the loss of arrest. If the overall average loss of arrest? 3%, the CFD trader should look for more gains? 6% on each trade as point.3 starting. Try to fix several arrests and restrictions regarding the operation of the fund. If a party moves 10% of the UN day? likely produce a range during the day much more? 3%, to the arrest and the goal should be enlarged accordingly. The levels of resistance and also support the reference points are very useful for targets.4 of price adjustment. If the market hits the initial target, one or the other end, the position where support or resistance around that area? seen to be valid, or move up to the arrest protects the profits and has left the position run.5. If there? sudden reversal in the trend of ongoing actions, the end position, where? winning or losing. The swings and roundabouts of Commerce usually the media that this unexpected trend will change even themselves out.6. Ensure that you are never too exposed in a sense. For example, if the market falls very dall'aperto, then the matter? t of? the doesn?, as though there are more? and want to put in your list of open positions, the huge gains on small glasses should exceed the arrests in weight that want to impress. I returnsAs for the purpose of deferring many traders have unrealistic expectations. A system that can? offer huge returns must have an inherently high risk, but consider this simple fact. Warren Buffett has done just pi? Returns of 20% per year on its investment fund and has not had to use the power of a lever to become the second man pi? friendly? s? the world?.
Mike Estrey